Tuesday, 31 January 2017

Audience

Hyperdermic Needle Theory
This group was responsible for the ‘HYPODEMIC NEEDLE MODEL’ believing that the mass audience were passive and could simply be ‘injected’ with messages created by media producers. Even though some critics still believe that there is some truth to this model (hence why age restrictions exist and some products are banned completely) others felt that this model over simplifies the situation. For example, David Morley did a nation wide ‘Reception Theory’ study in 1980 to determine how different audiences view the same text (he showed them all the same edition of Nationwide – a local news program shown after BBC One’s main evening news bulletin). He found that the way audiences interpreted a text generally fell under one of the following:
  • A preferred reading of the text most likely to be received by the intended target audience who share the same ideologies (people read it as the creators intended – this is the closest to the hypodermic needle).
  • An oppositional reading, generally by people who are not in the intended target audience (they reject the meaning intended and receive an alternative meaning).
  • A negotiated reading (basically accept the meaning but interpret it to suit their own position/ideologies.
In short, what this shows is that the majority of consumers are not passive and their reading of a text is influenced by their own ideologies – a product simply cannot ‘brainwash everyone’ like an injected drug. However, some are more susceptible and easily influenced (especially children who have yet to complete the early years of the socialization process), hence age ratings etc.
Uk Age Rating :
U- Suitable for All
PG- Parental Guidance 
12A-12 - Suitable for 12 years and over 

15- Suitable for 15 years and over

18 - Suitable only for adults 

R18- To be shown in only licensed cinema and sex shops 

USA Age Ratings:

G - General 

PG- Parental Guidance 

PG 13- Parents strongly cautioned 

R- Restricted 

NC 17 - Noone 17 and under
MASS AUDIENCE: mass audiences are basically large mainstream audiences who consume mainstream or popular culture (Marxist would claim that this audience is largely made up of the ‘working class’), such as Hollywood films, Eastenders, reality TV, Premiership football, simple Hollywood, tabloids etc. High culture, by contrast, is usually associated with broadsheets, opera, ballet and BBC Four. 


NICHE AUDIENCE: A niche audience is smaller than a mass audience but usually very influential e.g. those Marxist would define as upper class/middle class who controlled the media may wish to see ‘high culture’ programs hence the launch of BBC Four for those who wish to hear/see artistic high culture programs. Niche audiences don’t have to be this group though, they can be any small dedicated group who advertisers feel are worth targeting/marking products for. Examples could include, certain films (e.g. 'adult' movies - which can not really be called ‘high art’), fishing magazines, farming programs.


The Impact of Age Ratings in the contemporary Film Industry

On the bfi website, it states that the age range 15-24 had the largest proportion of the uk cinema audience at 31%.  22 Jump Street had the largest above-average audience share among the 15-24 age group. Of that 28%, 15 % males and 13% females.



British film makers in the 1990s ignored the market and made a lot of niche films rated 18 like Hardware (The head of a cyborg reactivates and rebuilds itself and goes on a violent rampage in a space marine's girlfriend's apartment.), The Comfort Stranger( An English couple holiday in Venice to sort out their relationship. There is some friction and distance between them, and we also sense they are being watched. One evening, they lose their way looking for a restaurant, and a stranger invites them to accompany him. He plies them with wine and grotesque stories from his childhood.) and Shallow Grave ( Three friends discover their new flatmate dead but loaded with cash.). I feel that none of these films would be an 18 rated film as this limits the audience. The largest proportion that go to the cinema is 15-24 year olds. They would be missing out on 3 years worth of film enthusiasts.
British films in the 2000 - 2016 like 

Thursday, 26 January 2017

Production Cycle

Sales Forecast:
This is basically the prediction on how much its going to cost to make.

Preparation of Budget:
The proposed budget by the finance dep and sales forecasts, are closely interrelated and management takes decision through these two rearing the annual or semi annual quality to be produced.

Engg: Dept : Prepare Details: Department is instructed to prepare drawing, part list and specification or check or modify existing ones.

Planning Activity: This activity is to be well informed about availability of Material and expected delivery of material which is already order. Its concerned with the make of detailed schedule of activity.

Dispatch: Its the process of setting production activies in motion through release of orders and instructions.

Progressing:

Inspection: The material process and assembling is inspected by a qualoty control dep.

Evaluation:This is the main pillar of the control function and has to carry out both during and after operations.

Stock: When the complete film is transferred through inspection it goes to stocks.

Delivery of Customer: Sent out to cinemas and shops to be sold and watched

Thursday, 19 January 2017

Finance

 Why has Hollywood dominated the industry since the 1980s?

Britain v Hollywood: Content 
* Hollywood started taking risks in the 1980s, producing massive thrilling, special effects driven adventurous films. By contrast, British films tended to be more conservative drawing on history and literature.
* British film makers tended to go down the path of 'gritty' social realism exploring social issues like homosexuality, drug taking, poverty, racism, class, religion etc. whereas Hollywood tended (and still tends) to avoid this in favour of glamorous escapism/fantasy that supports dominant social groups/ideologies (e.g. as Medhurst (1997) summarised "straight, middle class, able bodied white males" are in the staring roles etc.) - this obviously helped Hollywood films remain more lucrative because the majority of people in their target audience felt represented by this. 
* Hollywood grossed more profit/had more investment therefore could afford to continue affording the latest technology for special effects/filming/editing and the most talented people in the industry - this made British films look cheap in comparison (hence why UK cinemagoers began to prefer USA films and why British films found it hard to break into the international market place). 

Britain v Hollywood: Production/Distribution
* British films do not attract as much investment as Hollywood films and do not gross as much profit meaning Britain has less money to spend on the production of new films.
* Britain's film industry went down hill after two World Wars where Hollywood saw the need for escapist films and profited from this (the UK was harder hit as it was actually bombed but it also continued to make social realist films that did not cater for the post-war audience as well as the escapist films the USA was producing).
* Hollywood had always been good at production, vertical integration accounts for a lot of this because big conglomerate studios work together to produce films and this means the resources (financial, equipment and people) are always there allowing for continuous improvement. Britain does not have the same set up making it a lot harder to produce films. 
* Hollywood has had better 'business sense' in terms of production (vertical integration conglomerate set up) and distribution. In terms of distribution, Hollywood has developed a system that allows films to be exported around the globe in a way that ensured cinema exposure and profit. Britain has not manage to do this, even in the UK they often rely on USA distributors who have the right connections with multiplex cinemas etc! It is important to note that a number of multiplex chains are owned by USA companies (and have been since the 1980s - the point when British films hit an all time low) and this obviously has had a negative impact on the British film industry because it makes it harder to get British films in the cinemas without a USA distributor (see article below)... 



Major USA Production/Distribution Companies

As Hanseen (2007) summarised, 'The Hollywood studio system era' of vertical integration that impacted production, distribution and exhibition (because the major companies owned the cinemas) came to an end in 1948; "when the USA Supreme Court issued its famous Paramount decision. The Paramount consent decree required the divestiture of affiliated cinema chains and the abandonment of a number of vertical practices" (Hanseen, 2007 www.montana.edu/econ/seminar/Archive/hanssen8222007.pdf

What this meant, in theory, was that the five major conglomerates (Fox, MGM, Paramount, RKO and Warner Brothers) and the partly integrated companies (Columbia, Universal and United Artists - N.B MGM have now bought out United Artists) who had made up the Hollywood studio system had to compete on a more level playing field with other companies. However, these companies did still have an advantage over independent studios because vertical integration could still take place at production and distribution levels - the court only ruled against cinema ownership (exhibition).   

Today, the major USA Production companies associated with the term 'Hollywood' (many of whom also distribute their own films) are: 

Tuesday, 17 January 2017

The rise and fall of British cinema

In the 1900's, a guy named George Albert Smith invented the colourised scheme in 1908. Even though we were in the early years on the film industry, there was competition from two people Gaumout and pathe, both owning there own film companies. Around this time there was also films coming in from Europe. Pre war was not a great time for British cinema against the US. The US had kept up with the British at this time, however there one up was them making British films in the Uk. However, the during the war, that was halted and both sets kept to there own. Post war was fall of british cinema as the lack of money we had limited to bad movies. Americans on the other hand had more money meaning better movies.

Going through the years, we had another war however this kinda made it more popular as war films were bringing people to the cinema. They shown what the British wanted to see. Even post war, the british film business was still going strong but not at a rate like during the war. Comedies were starting to be made. This was a surprise hit after the country had been hit by a huge war. However it was considered relief after years of stress.
In the fifty-sixtys, the carry on films were a big hit. Often taking to micky out of some events in the war. Even after 15 years.

In 1949, the BBC brought lime groves studios as Television having a popular effect on the film industry. Hammer horror studios became a thing and it is by far the most successful studios the British has seen.

In the 60's big director names started to come through, like Richard Attenborough and Brian Forbes. The 60's was also the beginning of Bond. One of Britians best film sets to date. Directors had a large rein in the industry in the 60's leading us Brits to win 4 academy awards.

The 70's was a stale year for Britians Film Industry. The Americans stop paying for a lot of British films meaning money was a problem. Leading on to us making low budget rubbish films. Around this time however, horrors had started to become popular. Films like the Exorcist were made, later being taken out the cinemas as many people fainted while watching.

Then the 80's. Probably the worst years the British have seen in the film industry. We only made 31 movies, down 50 % from the year before. Chanel 4 and a couple other companies saw renewed optimism in the business.

Even though cinema audiences were climbing in the 90's, British films were gaining limited success. Channel 4’s own production company ‘Film on four’ which soon became ‘FilmFour’ turning out some classic cinema such as ‘Trainspotting’, ‘Brassed Off’ and ‘Lock Stock and Two smoking barrels’. There was no shortage however on great actors such as Ewan McGregor. 

The 20th and 21st century there are still plenty of great actors about however you are still very limited on great films. At this point we have made more james bonds and a new one called Harry Potter which was quite the hit. And with J.K.Rowling keeping her rights to the film it gave everyone in Britain a chance to do that to there films. 
The first personal computer was invented in 1977
In the 1970s the first major cars or transportation was made by overseas continents such as Asia and Europe.
The first cellular mobile phone was invented by Bell Labs and licensed by AT&T in 1977.
cable television - the first pay/premium television channel, Home Box Office (HBO), was founded in 1972 meaning trailers on tv


American 
1970's

Star wars EP 4 ( George Lucas )- $11 million - $775.4 million
Jaws (Steven Spielberg ) - $9 million - $470.7 million 




British

1970
- The railway children - £500,000- 





1980

- the awaking

1980's

E.T
Star wars EP 6
Ghostbusters
Back to the future

Thursday, 12 January 2017

British film industry History

SlumDog (British)
Genre: Reality Drama - British prefer to send a message 
Set: India
SlumDog used basic filming cameras which would lower the cost however the picture was still good
It had a budget of 15 million and made $377.9 million.
Directed byDanny Boyle
Produced byChristian Colson
Distributed by
Target Audience: 

Avatar (American) 
Genre: Fantasy Sci-Fi - Prefer 
Set: Out of this world (Pandora) 
Avatar developed there own 3D cameras which would of cost millionaires. 
Avatar made 2.788 billion while only spending 237 million. 
Distributed by20th Century Fox
Produced by
Target Audience: 

Wednesday, 11 January 2017


Which company produced the film (where did the funding come from)?
What was the production budget?
What year was it filmed and how long did filming take/where was it filmed?
What equipment was used for filming?
Nationality?
Who owns the source material?
Who were the main people involved?
Who were the principle cast members?
Extra production information
Distribution
What were the distribution companies?
What was the marketing budget?
Test screening information

Tuesday, 3 January 2017

My Chosen Films (case studies)




James Bond :Skyfall

Produced by :
Eon Productions

Production Cost: Big Budget ($150million +)

Where: Skyfall sees the secret agent returning to his Scottish roots, with the main part of the action taking place at Bond's family home, Skyfall Lodge, which is located in awe-inspiring
Glen Coe.

How long did it take to film: Filming began on 7 November 2011

What Equipment was used for filming:

Nationality: English

Who owns the source material:

Main People: Cast (in credits order) verified as complete  
Daniel Craig ...
Judi Dench ...
M
Javier Bardem ...
Ralph Fiennes ...
Naomie Harris ...
Eve
Bérénice Marlohe          ...
Severine (as Bérénice Lim Marlohe)

Who was the distributing company: MGM & Columbia Pictures (both owned by Sony)

Random Facts:

Sales Of Straight Razors Increased By 400% After They Were Featured In The Movie

irected bySam Mendes
Produced by
Screenplay by
Based onJames Bond
by Ian Fleming
Starring
Music byThomas Newman
CinematographyRoger Deakins
Edited by
Production
company
Distributed by
Release date
  • 23 October 2012 (London)
  • 26 October 2012(United Kingdom)
  • 9 November 2012(United States)
Running time
143 minutes[1]
CountryUnited Kingdom[2]
LanguageEnglish
Budget$150–200 million
Box office$1.109 billion[3]


Men in black 3:

Produced by: Amblin Entertainment, Hemisphere Media Capital, P+M Media Image Nation
Released by: Colombia Pictures

Production Cost:$215 million USD

Where: Mainly based in new York

How long: started working on it in January 2010

Nationality: American

Main cast:Cast (in credits order) complete, awaiting verification  
Will Smith ...
Tommy Lee Jones ...
Josh Brolin ...
Jemaine Clement ...
Emma Thompson ...
Michael Stuhlbarg ...
Mike Colter ...
Nicole Scherzinger ...
Michael Chernus ...
Directed byBarry Sonnenfeld
Produced by
Written byEtan Cohen
Based onThe Men in Black
by Lowell Cunningham
Starring
Music byDanny Elfman
CinematographyBill Pope
Edited byDon Zimmerman
Production
company
Distributed byColumbia Pictures
Release date
  • May 14, 2012 (Berlin)
  • May 25, 2012(United States)
Running time
106 minutes[1]
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$215 million[2]
Box office$624 million[3]

What is a British Film?

As critic McDougall (2008) states there are various 'official' ways of categorising British films. The most common is through using the following categories defined by the BFI (British Film Institute):


Category A: Films made with British money, personnel and resources.
Category B: Films co-funded with money from British and from foreign investment, but for which the majority of finance, cultural content and personnel are British.
Category C: Films with mostly foreign money (but non USA) investment and a small British input either financially or creatively.
Category D: Films made in the UK with (usually) British cultural content, but financed fully or partly by US companies.
Category E: US films with some British involvement.